MEDIA: Closing the sustainability loop

"One extra person can produce enough waste to undermine the recycling efforts of 20 citizens."


According to the United Nations, true sustainability is ‘development which meets the needs of current generations without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs’. In other words, an ecologically sustainable population can endure indefinitely.

For humans, sustainability has ecological, economic, political and cultural dimensions, and requires the reconciliation of all of these complex demands. There are no silver bullet solutions, particularly in an increasingly globalised world. But we need to start with some fundamentals.

Ultimately, a population’s sustainability is underpinned by the carrying capacity of the land on which it lives. Carrying capacity is the maximum population size of a species that the environment can sustain indefinitely, given the food, habitat, water, and other necessities available in the environment.

To understand carrying capacity, we need to clearly differentiate between quantity (or ‘space’) and quality. For example, there is plenty of ‘space’ in The Outback or on The Moon, but for humans the carrying capacity is low. Remember this next time you see a simplistic comparison of the number of people per square kilometre in a region or country.

For a population to endure indefinitely, it needs to behave sustainably in terms of its impact on the environment. Importantly, the economy - so often prioritised in public policy - is fully dependent on the environment. It is the environment that provides the resources and underpinnings of our economy, and hence quality of life. Nothing can articulate this more clearly than the often-repeated phrase ‘there are no jobs on a dead planet’.

How do we determine our total impact on the environment?

Human impact (I) on the environment equals the product of population (P), affluence (A) and technology (T). I = PAT is the lettering of a formula put forward to describe the impact of human activity on the environment, and describes how our growing population, affluence (or consumption behaviours), and technology contribute toward our environmental impact.

Holistic sustainability

Holistic sustainability must therefore involve all three key elements: affluence, technology and population numbers.

Amongst other things: We need to invest in new technologies, so that we can transition to a clean energy economy; We need to invest more in rail and public transport, so that we provide incentives for commuters and freight companies to change transport behaviours; We need to reduce our waste production and disposal through better product longevity, repairability and re-usability; and, We need to deliver more ecologically sustainable town planning, with simple things like effective insulation, solar panels and water tanks.

But holistic sustainability ensures that improvements in technology and consumption behaviours are not undermined by population growth, or vice-versa. For example, just one extra person can produce enough waste to undermine the lifetime recycling efforts of 20 citizens. This is especially important here in Australia, where our per capita environmental impact is higher than many other countries.

Put simply, if you halve your per capita consumption, but double your population, you’re right back where you started. There’s no point in painting the titanic green. We need to close the sustainability loop by simultaneously addressing technology, consumption and population. We should also recognise that technology can be a double edged-sword, and won’t necessarily ‘save us’. Many technologies, like super trawlers and chain saws, can increase our per capita impacts.

We need a holistic policy framework that redefines growth in our finite world. Redefined growth means better, not bigger. In the context of global leadership, the primary moral responsibility we have as a sovereign people is to pass on a sustainable Australia.

William Bourke is President of the federally registered Sustainable Australia Party.

Originally published at Green Lifestyle Magazine: CLICK HERE

Showing 5 reactions

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Susan Newbury
    commented 2019-05-15 11:57:20 +1000
    Very succinctly said!!!!!
  • David Temperley
    followed this page 2018-12-17 12:31:56 +1100
  • Bruce Johnson
    commented 2017-12-31 13:43:13 +1100
    The Sydney Morning Herald News Review recently published an article showing how Sydney’s urban sprawl is gobbling up good rural land in the Sydney basin, which still provides 20% of Sydney’s food. With 50,000 migrants coming to Sydney every year, there are only painful ways of avoiding further rural land depletion: rezone all inner and middle distance suburbs for high rise; sell off Centennial Park, Lane Cove National Park and municipal golf courses for home unit development; or introduce a one child policy for Sydney families. Or we can reduce the level of immigration.
  • Veronica Baker
    commented 2016-04-10 16:00:06 +1000
    Please follow the party that follows Australia’s people. Holds true our way of life. Keep our country sustainable and bring back agriculture and manufacturing. Minimise immigration so that this our beautiful Australia can maintain its green spaces and have children grow up the way we all had the opportunity to do.
  • Christopher Maclay
    commented 2015-08-17 19:15:54 +1000
    The argument is simple and persuasive. More people equals more environmental damage and less per capita share of what’s available. The obvious target for this message is the progressive environmental lobby… who have up until now been reticent to discuss the role of population in human impact.